Je hebt een klacht over de onderstaande posting:
De bron zegt: ... he had sent some of the photos he found in Kent's computer to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), a federally funded group that gathers information on missing children or those believed to have been used for child pornography. ... en: ... had analyzed the photos and had determined about 20 of the children depicted in them were on the database. ... en dit: ... most of the photos he sent to the center were taken from the hard drive of Kent's office computer, which was seized from his office in Dyson Hall in April 2007 ... a few of the images were found on computer disks seized by police from Kent's Kingston home in September 2007. Dit laatste stuk vind ik nogal verdacht klinken. Het zou kunnen dat het redundante HD backup images zijn van zijn kantoorcomputer, die hij thuis had liggen. Laat ons hopen dat de gerechtsdienaars hier wel voldoende bij de zaak zijn om eventuele 'spin' van beide partijen te doorzien.
Beschrijf je klacht (Optioneel):