Abuse Melding

Je hebt een klacht over de onderstaande posting:

23-11-2012, 13:50 door Anoniem

Tests like these are just tests - they do not reflect the real world situation. Much more important is the final results. As for testing Microsoft products - Microsoft concept for antimalware protection is based on protection from different sources - there are Microsoft antimalware technologies built in Windows (UAC, Windows Firewall, SmartScreen filter for Windows, etc) , in IE (Protected mode, Enhanced protected mode, Smart Screen Filter for IE, etc), anti-spam in online and offline products. Other vendors rely on a single product - Internet Security suite that has all the technologies built into one thing. In these kind of tests and in this one particularly, the tester compares full of features IS vs basic AV (e.g BitDefender , Kaspersky vs Microsoft). This is not correct. Have a look at the methods AV-Test uses and you'll notices that it does not check other MS technologies. But the suite is checked in its full features. The reason MSE/FEP is so low on tests is the reason the tester does not ...

Beschrijf je klacht (Optioneel):

captcha