Je hebt een klacht over de onderstaande posting:
Door Erik van Straten, 17:43 uur: http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/6/B/16B06F60-3B20-4FF2-B699-5E9B7962F9AE/VSU4/vcredist_arm.exe (1.4MB) and http://download.microsoft.com/download/F/B/7/FB728406-A1EE-4AB5-9C56-74EB8BDDF2FF/ENU/x86/ReportViewer.msi (7.5MB). http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/C/5/7C514257-287C-49A9-BF50-F86BB3D4E60C/1033/x86/PowerPivot_for_Excel_x86.msi (95MB). I just downloaded these files. All use an SHA256 timestamp that validates correctly under W7. I would be very much surprised if these file's signatures validate correctly in Vista (@Spiff: please check!) [...] To confirm that EMET 4.1 Update 1 still exhibits the same behavior, I just downloaded http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/A/A/7AA570E7-92DF-4C28-BE12-E72831797666/EMET%20Setup.msi and can confirm that it still is the same file (i.e. also uses an SHA256 timestamp). I checked. As expected: None of those files' signatures validate correctly in Vista SP2 x86.
Beschrijf je klacht (Optioneel):