Je hebt een klacht over de onderstaande posting:
Het artikel van Ars Technica (zie link in artikel) stelt dat de documenten niet van de Clinton Foundation afkomstig zijn, maar buitgemaakt zijn in eerdere hacks: http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/10/guccifer-2-0-posts-dccc-docs-says-theyre-from-clinton-foundation/However, a review by Ars found that the files are clearly not from the Clinton Foundation. While some of the individual files contain real data, much of it came from other breaches Guccifer 2.0 has claimed credit for at the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee—hacks that researchers and officials have tied to "threat groups" connected to the Russian Government. Other data could have been aggregated from public information, while some appears to be fabricated as propaganda. It's hard to tell, because other than authorship information, some files have been scrubbed of the "custom properties" fields that tell things like the version of Office applications that were used to create them.
Beschrijf je klacht (Optioneel):