Even in de uitspraak kijken … "19 … There are sufficient facts in the affidavit to believe that evidence of the crime will be found 20 at the Subject Premises, so the Government has probable cause to conduct a lawful search, so long 21 as it comports with the Fourth Amendment," … "25 In addition to the search of the premises, the Government seeks an order that would allow 26 agents executing this warrant to compel "any individual, who is found at the Subject Premises and 27 reasonably believed by law enforcement to be a user of the device, to unlock the device using 28 biometrie features...." (Aff. 117h.) This request is overbroad. There are two suspects identified in 1 the affidavit, but the request is neither limited to a particular person nor a particular device." Wat er staat is dat er met gegronde redenen twee personen terecht verdacht zijn van bedreiging (inbeuk op privacy van anderen). De rechter zou het goed gevonden kunnen hebben als het onderzoek ook deze twee personen met naam ...